 Very recently I was asked about the role of product in the context of an early startup and Agtech– this is a really great question and so I thought I would write a little bit about it, because an early product-driven approach helps to go from an idea, into validating that idea and eventually scaling it into a valuable business. So, in this note, I think it’s fair to answer the question: what do product managers do? Setting up the stage Product managers are responsible for understanding all aspect of a company’s product from initial discovery to framing possible solutions, product teams will shape the product until it achieves product-market fit. But … what is “a product”? A product (or set of products) is a solution to a problem (or sets of problems) that the company’s customers are currently facing. Product Managers are therefore responsible for understanding all aspects of this product (or set of products, like in the case of a platform solution, for example). They’ll accomplish this by exploring “the problem(s)” that the company has been funded for fixing, testing the founder’s proposed solution against carefully crafted hypotheses and iterating the product through small, measured changes. In fully understanding the problem landscape, product managers will be able to shepherd the product from an initial idea (or sets of ideas) in the business plan to a fully fleshed solution to the customer’s problem. But wait. Isn’t the founder the product manager? Ben Horowitz famously said that the product manager is the “CEO of the product” – without context, maybe sometimes there is confusion about the role of product teams from technically-minded CTO- and business-oriented CEO-founders. Actually, Product exactly sits right in between the Business and its Technology. And there are founders who have a natural inclination towards product and usually during beta phase and possibly stealth mode they play a key role in shaping the product. However, as their company grows, they’ll have a growing list of competing interests like strategic fit and fundraising leaving the ground product management to a dedicated product team. Moreover, while the founders shape the vision of the company and the strategy on how to fulfill it, the product team should support the founders by validating their vision and strategy against the market and to build on the business goal to create valuable products for the customers. So, it makes sense to separate the roles early on so that founders can focus on strategy and fundraising while product focuses on addressing the changing needs of customers. So how does this look like in the context of an early stage startup? Product’s primary responsibility is to have a full understanding of the problem landscape to provide the best solution for customers. In practice this means that product managers are responsible for discovery, managing the build of the product and then, iterating the product based on customer feedback. The Discovery Phase Founders always have a set of business goals in mind and as we consider building products, the product team will be responsible for digesting these business goals and embark on the discovery process, which essentially boils down to speaking and surveying potential customers in order to best answer the following product market-fit questions:
In practice and when this is possible, this means talking and harvesting customer experiences and key challenges, where possible compare against market research data (and any other data-driven source) and using these insights into accurate customer personas (the “who”) that are centered on the results of good user research (the “why”), and understanding of what needs to be built vs. the nice to have (the “what”) resulting in a prioritized list of product goals (the “how”). In early stage startups this phase could take from 4-6 weeks to a few months depending on the market and potential customer pool – in B2B cases, the pool of potential actors are all over a supply-demand value chain for example, that discovery might become more cumbersome to get crisp clear on business goals alignment, customer interviews, stakeholder interviews, creating personas and the synthesis of all user research to get to, ideally, a design sprint (made super popular by Jake Knapp at GV a decade ago) during which the product team ingests user research, iterates through ideas, creates a prototype product and tests it with key market actors to validate interest. Usually founders, product, dev and design run the sprint. Building the product(s) Once discovery is complete and we have decided what to build, it’s the responsibility of the product team to manage the building process. For digital software products, with an outline of the solution to the customers problem, product managers will breakdown the large tasks (usually referenced in an Epic) into more manageable tasks (called user stories) that capture a piece of value for the user and form the basis of discussion between designers and developers in the team on how to build this feature in the product. Organized in a prioritized backlog, product managers will work with the development team to build the product at the cadence of two- or three-week sprints (if the methodology is agile scrum) and release it to customers. Measuring and iterating As the company releases the product in small releases the product team will have a chance to gather quantitative data (in the form of product analytics if the product is digital and connected) and qualitative feedback (user interviews) after each release. This basically helps build a good picture of whether the product is addressing the company’s business goals and will help identify areas where the product isn’t solving customer problems clearly enough. Measure and iterate is the third leg of the product manager’s stool: with each new release comes a good opportunity to gather more data and make small changes to the product (especially if this is a software/digital product) in order to potentially improve KPIs on the product (for example engagement, repeat usage or even conversion for software platforms) – this process of measuring and quantifying each customer interaction with the product will lead directly back to suggesting solutions all the way to new user stories and alternate prioritizations in the dev team’s backlog. In conclusion: why do startups need early product thinking? Bill Campbell, former CEO of Intuit, spoke of the importance of hiring a product-minded individuals when he suggested that his first big hire would be “somebody who can really understand the dynamics of what goes on in a marketplace, apply technology to that marketplace, see how the technology can work, and continue to advise brilliant scientists so they can adapt their products to make sure customers are happy.” Fully understanding the problem leads to innovative solutions that founders and startups can take advantage of when building the business. Product teams:
Product teams’ main benefit is that they’ll help reduce both human and financial wasted investment (of building the wrong product, which also results in wasted development time, etc). Rolling out a product that doesn’t have market fit and doesn’t resonate with customers is an expensive setback that most startups won’t recover from. A product team focusing on the discovery phase will dramatically reduce the risk on the company’s product being rejected by customers. In addition, product teams have the responsibility to collect customer feedback and use the data to iterate on the product. Data analytics and metrics-driven development reduces time spent on reworking a product to fit the market. Starting with a well baked MVP (Minimum Viable Product) and then releasing bit by bit drastically reduces risk that a product won’t solve customers’ problems as well as reducing the amount of time to fix that One of the key responsibilities of a product team is to create, and maintain, internal alignment. Usually, there is a “Goals Alignment Workshop” with the Founders and all major stakeholders ahead of the discovery phase (not always necessary by the way) with the goal of extracting all the key business goals (and any product goals) that will influence the development of the product. One of the side effects of having a product team working hard on gathering feedback from customers is to foster a data-drive culture of experimentation: as the customer base grows, it becomes more and more difficult to make big changes and as a result a culture of experimentation becomes key. And in the end, all of this leads to better customer intelligence – to provide more value to customers. By making small changes and measuring the impact, both the customer needs and challenges can be validated with more granularity and precision – as well as the product team’s assumptions to address these needs and challenges! And lastly, product teams always emphasize on lean product building which prioritizes only what is necessary and pushes the “nice to haves” to future dates in order to keep the build process on budget while at the same time providing customers with the features they need and value. This process starts in discovery but really becomes apparent when working with the development team to build a backlog of properly formed User Stories to work on. Let me know what you think here.
My name's phil mora and I blog about the things I love fitness, hacking work, tech and anything holistic. New Chapter! Head of Product at Vayda Vayda is advancing regenerative outcomes in agriculture. By combining regenerative principles and a high-tech approach, we are focused on facilitating the reversal of climate change, while rebuilding natural ecosystems and feeding people with healthier food. thinker, doer, designer, coder, leader
0 Comments
 Last month I started my next chapter in helping change in ag, and I briefly talked about my thoughts on the future of ag and regenerative agriculture practices. I am adding a few more thoughts in this note, along with a very cool little youtube vid I found when doing some cursory research last weekend. And with more recent mainstream press coverage for sure discovery work is in progress! In this note, I am trying to get my head around understanding a little bit more, at a very high level, the differences and challenges to the conversion. It’s amazing to see that regenerative farmers in the EU, North America, Brazil, Australia, and India (mainly) are working actively to change the way we farm in this decade and as a result increase biodiversity, enrich soils, improve watersheds, and enhancing the health of livestock and wildlife. And by thinking more holistically, they in turn increase the resilience of their farms to weather events and help boost the sustainability of their communities as well. And with government policies and the food industry looking for solutions that will improve and secure food supplies in the post-covid era, orgs in the US, Brazil, India and the EU are planning to have millions of acres converted to regenerative farming methods (for example, Patagonia, Danone, General Mills and Mc Cain) and invested multi-million-dollar budgets. Recap: 5 principles of regenerative agriculture: Regenerative Ag has five main principles,
These are put into practice under a general, guiding principle of integrating all the farm’s operations as far as possible. In today’s conventional farming approach, crops and livestock production are typically kept separate. Regenerative agriculture combines them in circular ecosystems; essentially, the animals feed the plants, and the plants feed the animals. The regulated grazing of sheep or cows, for example, encourages plant growth, and distributes natural nutrients back over the land in the form of dung. Poultry also fertilizes land, as well as eating unwelcome bugs and weeds. The focus of regenerative farming is most commonly to be the quality and performance of the soil, and regenerative farmers use growing practices that improve the health of their land (by the way there is now evidence that this approach can enrich soil and improve watersheds, which reduces topsoil runoff) , with the more common regenerative farming methods including:
For the last century industrial farming has prioritized increasing production. Regenerative Agriculture addresses cost and regards profit for farmers as more important than production: if we can produce the same output with half the input, the farmer makes more money. Some see this as farming the way it used to be, before the shit to heavy mechanization and intense chemical us in the 1950s and 60s, which encouraged monocultures and ever-larger farms The advantages of regenerative farming in infiltration and biodiversity Improving the soil not only increases fertility in a sustainable way, but also tends to improve water infiltration. Better infiltration means less runoff, and also less erosion and pollution from soil being carried away in the runoff water. In some areas, water springs that dried up several years ago have begun to flow again due to new regenerative farming approaches. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted supply chains and demand, and increased the amount of food waste in farms and fields while threatening food security for many. As agriculture gradually regains its footing, participants and stakeholders are casting an eye ahead, to safeguarding food supplies against the potentially greater and more disruptive effects and once again, innovation and advanced technologies are making a powerful contribution to secure and sustainable food production. And as a new agricultural ecosystem rapidly emerges, I am convinced that regenerative ag is very well positioned to replace 20th century conventional farming. Let me know what you think here.
My name's phil mora and I blog about the things I love fitness, hacking work, tech and anything holistic. New Chapter! Head of Product at Vayda Vayda is advancing regenerative outcomes in agriculture. By combining regenerative principles and a high-tech approach, we are focused on facilitating the reversal of climate change, while rebuilding natural ecosystems and feeding people with healthier food. thinker, doer, designer, coder, leader  What is regenerative agriculture? As climate change becomes a more mainstream issue, consumers, farmers, brands and retailers are beginning to take a closer look at how to review land and animal management practices: if current topsoil degradation rates continue unchecked, all topsoil could be depleted in 60 years. And since it takes 1,000 years to generate one inch (3 centimeters) of topsoil naturally, now is a good time to take action. Sustaining topsoil isn’t enough. We need also to adopt practices that can regenerate soils with improving soil health as the central foundation. While the term “regenerative agriculture” can have many meanings, in general it describes farming and grazing practices such as restoring degraded soil, improving biodiversity, and increasing carbon capture with the intention of creating long-term environmental benefits, positively impacting climate change while drastically improving farm profitability. Balancing profitability and sustainability: regenerative agricultural practices can protect the environment, improve soil fertility, and optimize long-term profitably to create greater food security. Increasingly, precision farmers use geo-enabled smart devices and cloud computing to understand how no-till, cover crops, rotational grazing, and other sustainable practices contribute to better soil health, biodiversity, and CO2 sequestration. Regenerative Agriculture Practices Regenerative agriculture practices improve the overall health of soil and the environment. One of the key principles of regenerative agriculture is to keep the soil covered at all times. This is achieved through cover crops, which protect the soil from wind and water erosion, lower the temperature of the soil, and feed the microorganisms within it. A “no till” guideline helps to protect the soil’s natural microbiome, so by limiting the disturbance of the soil, it maintains its structure and prevents erosion. Lastly, regenerative agriculture promotes crop diversity. Biological ecosystems are maintained and strengthened by cultivating a diverse number of crops, which work to enrich and restore the health of the soil as well as create a habitat for beneficial insects. In summary: financial impact of employing regenerative agriculture practices comes not only from the improvement and productivity of the soil profile but also from the effects and implications of the regenerative agricultural practices. Four basic principles govern regenerative agriculture:
With the successful implementation of each practice, soil microbial, fungi, and bacterial populations strengthen the symbiotic relationship with one another, nutrients and minerals, water, and, most importantly, the roots of a developing crop. These relationships form the nexus of soil health, untapped yield potential, nutrient cycling, porosity, water infiltration, and organic matter development. Improved soil health reduces the need for excessive fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide inputs by creating an optimal environment of nutrient cycling and plant vigor; this allows plants to compete better and face growing-season challenges. By progressing through these practices, allowing each principle to build on the next, a sustainable production model is created. How Consumers Can Help The easiest way consumers can contribute is to align themselves with brands that utilize products grown via regenerative agriculture. By way of vegetable and grains, consumers can do research to see if the farms where these products were grown utilized regenerative agriculture concepts like cover crops, crop rotation, and no-till. By way of meat, dairy, and eggs, consumers can look into if the farmers utilized practices like holistic management and rotational grazing And now, the proof is in the pudding – here’s a great TedX talk from Gabe Brown, a regenerative farmer in North Dakota and a pioneer of soil health. Let me know what you think here. My name's phil mora and I blog about the things I love fitness, hacking work, tech and anything holistic. New Chapter! Head of Product at Vayda Vayda is advancing regenerative outcomes in agriculture. By combining regenerative principles and a high-tech approach, we are focused on facilitating the reversal of climate change, while rebuilding natural ecosystems and feeding people with healthier food. thinker, doer, designer, coder, leader  This is a follow-up from a few previous notes about influencing without authority because product managers have a unique challenge in that they own the product roadmap yet they do not manage any of the people who are directly responsible for executing on a company’s products – and as this organizational design continues to develop it leads product managers to need the ability to influence others to help them achieve their objectives without the direct authority to do so. A quick reminder of the previous episode, in the dangerous animals of product management (Read the original article here and my note about it here).
In order to effectively deal with those dangerous animals, product managers essentially must master the art of influencing without authority – and that requires a unique mix of hard and soft skills. And while each animal requires a different approach, dealing with them more often than not involves one or more of the following tactics:
Let me know what you think here. My name's phil mora and I blog about the things I love fitness, hacking work, tech and anything holistic. Head of Product thinker, doer, designer, coder, leader |
i blog about the things I love: fitness, hacking work, tech, Experiences and anything holistic.
Phil Mora> Head of Product at Vayda Categories
All
Archives
September 2021
|
RSS Feed